Author: Bob McMichael

  • Chukar Science

    Chukar Science

    A while back we took a shooting lesson from a certified shotgun instructor. We learned a lot, it increased the number of birds we bagged, and improved the ethical component of upland bird hunting: more clean kills and fewer cripples.

    The instructor, Joel Loftis, has written an impressively detailed guide aimed (pun intended) specifically at chukar hunters, and I’m pleased to offer it for sale in our Shop.

    The Chukar Hunter’s Wingshooting Guide, which Joel wrote as an extended syllabus for his shooting students, includes a ton of information about vision, balanced loads, patterning, setup, gun fit, strategy, and has the most extensive bibliography of any upland hunting book I’ve seen. The guide reflects the intensity of Joel’s instruction style, is remarkably well-written, and is based on an impressively wide range of research. Chukar hunters will know that there are a few books out there on hunting this stellar bird (name the books), but none of them go into the level of detail Joel provides in this guide. Below is a photo of the Table of Contents. Check it out.

  • Open for Business

    Open for Business

    It is early, and we are feeling it.

    It’s on. Unusually cool weather for the opening weekend of chukar season made things more comfortable than normal, if “comfortable” is even legal to use in describing anything related to chukar hunting.

    Waterdogs

    We took the boat out on one of the many nearby reservoirs and found a spot that beckoned. I didn’t open with a triple on the first point as I did last year, but my shooting was better than normal; I’m not sure if it was superior focus, the bottled eagerness from having to wait 8 months to do this again, better positioning on the point (more on that below), unskilled elusive maneuvers by the young and unhunted birds, the new load I’m trying (more on that, below as well), or some of all of that. Or it could just be inexplicable. That would be fine. I like mystery.

    The Aged Warrior of the Chukar Hills. 12+, going strong, kicking ass and taking names and chukar.

    Leslie also made a nifty shot on a grouse-sized chukar, off of a swell point by Peat, the latter of whom chose to bypass Leslie and run over a ridge with the bird to bring it to me. I’m pleased he remembered our little chat about how I’d love it if he could help pad my stats this season: birds in the bag divided by shots fired = shooting percentage. Good boy!

    Peat trying to pad my stats
    Nifty, after a little reorganizing of the bag

    Sunday we decided to try somewhere away from the water, and it held birds, too. I ended up with my first three-species bag of chukar, Hun, and quail. The wet spring and not-so-hot summer seemed to have been as easy on the birds as we’d hoped, and I was very pleased with the numbers of birds we saw in both places.

    No birds in sight: notice the little things when you’re out there

    This is not a complaint, because to do so would be stupid, but the percentage of first-year birds in my bag was very big and the birds were very small. Idaho did move the opener a week later this year (sort of), but in my humble opinion, even another two weeks would allow the birds to mature. I think Oregon’s season makes more sense than Idaho’s. But you don’t see me protesting by sitting out the first couple of weeks of our season. Not sure what to do with that.

    Most of you probably already do this, but the last couple of seasons I’ve really been trying to make sure I’m below my dogs’ points by a good margin. If we’re climbing that’s obviously not that hard to do, aside from fighting gravity and the curse of aging cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems. But when working a ridge or draws, and the dogs move down and find birds, I try to go really wide and down below the dogs by at least 10 or 15 yards and then slowly (and quietly if possible) close the gap. This has yielded far easier shots at birds than when I didn’t do this: downhill, curling shots with dogs in the way are nearly impossible, at least for me (and please don’t suggest the solution is to train steady to wing; we’re not going to agree on that). Ironically, when I was younger I’d obsess about not losing elevation, even on a point, so I’d go straight down to a pointing dog, and — at least 75% of the time — miss. Giving up an additional 50 feet of elevation in exchange for more humane and makable shots is very much worth it in my book. And I’m spending less on shells as my shooting percentage improves simply because of positioning.

    I’m actually not spending less on shells, but buying fewer, more expensive shells. I’ve always shot cheap, lead 1-1/8 oz. 7-1/2 shells, all season, for all birds. My improved cylinder choke also never leaves the gun (except maybe for turkey season). I’ve never claimed to be a ballistics expert, or even that well educated on the matter. I’ve just used what I thought worked for me. A lot of people have suggested that #6 would be better on chukar, so I decided finally to give it a shot, but the only #6 shells I had were steel duck loads, 1-1/8 oz. I’ve only given it two days, but they worked well for me, and I’m going to try this for a while. I’ve wanted to move away from lead if possible, mainly for environmental reasons (not interested in a debate on this, either), but just haven’t done it for whatever reason. I might not stick to it, but I’m happy with the results so far. I also haven’t really done my due diligence and done the patterning and balanced load tests that Joel Loftis, the author and shooting coach (stay tuned for a post very soon on his Chukar Hunter’s Wingshooting Guide, which will be available on our website), recommends; once I do that I might have a completely different take. Still, in two days with lots of shooting I basically doubled my shooting percentage over last year, despite not shooting clays once this summer or pre-season.

    So there you have it: an excellent beginning to the long-awaited season. We saw more chukar hunters in boats than I ever remember seeing, and plenty more on and around the hills, which is a good thing if we want to keep this thing going and the public land it happens on accessible. May each of you get out there as much as possible, enjoy the pursuit and your (and your friends’) dogs, and remember that it’s not just about the birds!

    Someone tell Peat it’s not just about the birds
    Post-opener conference in Hells Canyon Beer/Chukar Culture pub with the legend Sam
  • Glenna

    Glenna

    Glennamouth
    My first dog before she haunted me. Looking out my classroom window today, the view of the opaque winter sky obscured by piling snow, I had this thought…

    [This is a re-post from 3 years ago; 9 years ago today I had to put my first dog down. Glenna changed my life forever.]

    When I was 37 I moved to Boise, Idaho, where I knew nobody and didn’t have a job. I rented a house, my first time living in a house since I left my parents’ house after graduating high school. It was a small house, with a small backyard closed in with a white picket fence and a one-car detached garage. Six months after moving in, I’d skin my first deer in that garage, my experienced younger brother driving from five hours away to teach me how to do it. My right index finger bears a scar from one of my slips with a sharp knife. That night, we grilled some of the meat and ate it with his wife and two boys.

    I shot that deer with a friend of mine who was also on his first big game hunting trip. We stayed at my dad’s cabin in eastern Idaho, which I’d visited nearly every summer since I was 10, and whose existence and setting served as the primary reason I chose to move to Idaho. I wanted to hunt birds and big game as a resident because it was much cheaper, and Idaho had lots of public land and our cabin. Boise was a big town and I figured I could get a job and make a living.

    It was a big change for me, and scary. I was lonely at the beginning when I was trying to figure out what I’d done, and why. The frame made sense to me, but the canvas was still blank. I bought a bird dog puppy from a backyard breeder in Mountain Home, my first dog, a few weeks after arriving at my rented house. The girlfriend from whom I was slowly separating helped me move from California, she helped me unpack, helped me buy sundries from Target, helped me absorb the weirdness of moving ten hours northeast. But she left after a couple weeks, and I got the puppy to stamp some kind of seal on my new life.

    Glenna challenged me. I read the book my brother had used to train his remarkable first dog of the same breed. It sort of made sense, but the puppy didn’t, and I wasn’t a good trainer. A scar from her baby incisor on my left palm, near the thumb, reminds me of her jubilant puppy play. A decade after getting her, during which time I rarely hunted with her because she ran too big and hunted for herself, she was buried in my brother-in-law’s yard in the mountains not far away. Dave dug the hole, which, empty, looked excessively deep and wide, but just barely held her and her first toy, a stuffed cougar the size of a burrito. Dave had lots of experience digging dog graves, with several interred nearby. I dropped dirt as gently as I could on Glenna while my three-year-old dog Angus ran around, seemingly oblivious. I didn’t understand what I clearly saw.

    Those first new months here, I told myself that this is my new life. I still tell myself that, despite all that’s happened since. It’s been sixteen years. There’s still the fluttering in my stomach, and the questions. And the images. The one that haunts me, the one that is among the richest and brings back smells and shapes and a certain humidity, is the sight of Glenna, white and orange, sitting upright patiently and eagerly from young puppy to full-grown dog in the middle of the green grassy backyard, bordered by white pickets she could easily have leaped over but never did, late in the July afternoon heat, fragmentedly shaded by huge catalpa and silver maple trees, waiting and looking and watching for a glimpse of me coming home from work on my bike.

  • Just Fish

    Just Fish

    riverrun, past Eve and Adam’s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodious vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.

    –James Joyce, Finnegan’s Wake

    I spent most of my summer building a relationship with our first drift boat, exclusively on the Missouri River tailwater downstream from Holter Dam, about 45 minutes northeast of Helena, Montana. If you think I’m revealing a secret spot, you haven’t been there. It’s been long found, centuries before Lewis and Clark made it happily scabbily through the Gates of the Mountains. And its known-ness doesn’t diminish, at least in my mind, its greatness. Some things last, even if they’re altered a bit (in this case, by dams).

    Our wonderful Adipose Flow, made in Helena

    Like most relationships of any kind, this one of mine with the drift boat involved other creatures, had its ups and downs, and asked me to think about it a little. Or a lot, depending on the day.

    But none of that is actually very interesting.

    What is interesting, I think, is just the fact that we can — and did — do it. And so can you, if inclined. First, it’s public land, er, water, so anyone can use it, regardless of whether it involves fishing. And, especially during the warmer weekends, inflatable unicorn rafts captained by drunk college sophomores shared the same runs, holes, and riffles with professional guides whose livelihoods are directly affected by how many mind-blowing rainbow and brown trout they get their Ivy League clients into. Wondrously, it all works, and everyone gets along, even if they don’t share the same musical tastes as the pilots of the flagellant flotillas (flotilli?).

    Second, when fishing is your primary objective, whether it’s spin, bait, or fly fishing, all you gotta do is do it. There’s not much else in life that flows that way (chukar hunting is kind of that way, but requires much more intense physical exertion). And as long as you’re down with the goal, going about achieving it feels not just right but absolutely righteous. Or at least it did to me. No matter the weather, we were fishing. If the weather was really bad (which it was occasionally) we’d leave the dogs in the camper, double-check our rain gear in the boat, and put in. Otherwise we’d either go early, usually putting in before any other boats, as much for aesthetic reasons as angling, or late, after all the guides had launched, and we’d take our time moving downstream, often pleasantly surprised by a ripe mid-day hatch of Pale Morning Duns, caddis, or even a second wave of minuscule trico mayflies (tricorythodes). The most special floats, though, were the twilight rides down this placid, eurythmic stretch of the longest river in North America. The light, which you’re moving precisely through the middle of, sandwiched and slowly sliding between the sky and its reflection in the water, constantly changes, in concert with the river’s micro-currents and subtle upswells, not to mention the staggering number of very large trout rising to sip caddis or mayflies from the surface. It’s a very “commodious vicus of recirculation.”

    Twilight highlight

    The righteous feeling of doing this also has a lot to do with the fact that rivers are truly the earth’s major recirculating forces and vessels. Looking at a map of rivers one sees the obvious resemblance to a diagram of the arteries of the human body; the Missouri is the aorta, or maybe the carotid.

    James Joyce’s “novel” Finnegan’s Wake (1939) poses Dublin, Ireland’s main river, the Liffey, as the ultimate repository of all sensation there, like the subconscious is for people; whatever the river ever witnessed could come back mixed up with anything else in its massive, infinitely expanding hard drive, as dreams do for us. Literary critics described Joyce’s experimental writing style, in which the English language spews forth in seemingly random, indiscriminate and made-up words and phrases, as “stream of consciousness.” It’s a beautiful idea to think of rivers that way, that they have a collective and collecting consciousness, and to think of our lives and minds as rivers. Not only do rivers manage and recirculate the earth’s lifeblood, they capture memories and experiences, and host the life cycles of the hundreds of species of mayflies, trout, carp, whitefish, salmon, perch, crawfish, raccoons, mink, muskrats, beavers, ducks and geese, ospreys, eagles, herons, engineering majors bucolically buoyed by inflatable unicorns. Imagine a world without rivers. You can’t.

    And then there’s fishing.

    Fly fishing isn’t easy to do well, and it’s harder to learn. The corny like to say, “That’s why it’s called ‘fishing’ and not ‘catching!’” Yeah. Thanks for that. But a cursory glance in a fly shop will tell you that despite its challenging nature, fly fishing still attracts a healthy clientele with disposable income, and guide services provide highly competent (and ridiculously patient) stewards of these liquid resources to capitalize on this demographic.

    And there’s really two completely different types of fly fishing, distinguished by the boundary between air and water, which is manifested by the surface of the water: dry fly, and then everything else. According to Norman Maclean’s dad, who was a preacher and so I’ll take his word for it, even though Norman’s book A River Runs Through It was turned into the movie Robert Redford made that “ruined fly fishing in Montana” according to our guide on the Gates of the Mountain boat tour (who knew his sh*t), John the Baptist was a dry fly fisherman. Which makes dry fly fishing the only real fly fishing. As a bumper sticker I saw in the parking lot at the boat ramp in Craig, Montana said: “If it were any easier it’d be called ‘trolling.’”

    A typical specimen

    I’m not trying to start anything here, ’cause I’m not like that, but this is the truth, and it has its costs: fly fishing is fishing with flies that ride on top of the water. Fly fishing is dry fly fishing. Sadly, for those of us who cop an attitude about this, about 80% of what trout eat comes to them below the surface of the water. So that’s the argument for nymphing and streamer fishing, and maybe those who claim to like to use an “emerger” and a dry fly (talk about hedging your bets). Dry fly, er, fly fishing is really hard because you have to make the fly you use appear to be an actual insect, un-connected to a leader and floating like a normal part of the trout’s puny on-top-of-the-surface diet. All non-fiction rivers have lots of different currents in the same spot which God no doubt designed to frustrate the hell out of John The Baptist’s angling progeny. Making your dry fly look to a trout like a “regular” bug is called getting a “good drift.” With 12 to 15 feet of 2-pound test monofilament leader between your plastic fly line and the fake bug you’re using to trick a trout into being tortured (and then released! so ridiculous), getting a good drift is a half-cent shy of a miracle. And the trout on the Missouri are miraculous and not easily impressed by mediocrity when it comes to floating bugs.

    My 6wt rod bent like a baby willow

    But that’s the game, and we disciples love it. Lots of us. The thing is, if you try to teach your spouse how to get a good drift, which involves a bunch of things ten times harder than learning how to drive a stick shift or split an atom, you’re surely headed for a conversation about divorce. Only John The Baptist can rescue you if you dare to try this. I know. So does my wife.

    But…

    We did it. Somehow. Leslie caught fish, fly fishing (i.e., using dry flies), punctuated by vows never to fly fish, fish, set foot or bum in a boat, set foot in Montana, and other things equally tragic but unfit for print. Happily for the dogs, we managed to resolve these issues with plenty of good Montana craft beer, a beautiful Galvan 5wt reel, some wonderful interludes with family and friends, and pleas for forgiveness and second-chances. All of which allowed me, and us, to finish our glorious tenure up there with aplomb and a decent catch-rate.

    It was right. My first summer of that much rightness in a very long time, maybe ever. We were obliged only to fish if we felt like it. We just floated and fished. It wasn’t shy of enough, or more than enough. It was just enough. It was just. It was righteous. I want to recognize that because it was rare. Just fish.

    Leslie and her audience

    Peat and Angus might not agree with my paean here, and I need to acknowledge that as well. But their forbearance allowed us to do this. They are not crazy about spending 10 hours in a drift boat with only a few pee breaks on bug-infested islets. If they had a new brain, it probably would have run an endless loop of “this is cruel and unusual.” But they tolerated the program, which really is what has allowed me to rediscover fly fishing: before the drift boat, we’d have to leave them in the car or camper, which often wasn’t an option. Over the course of the summer, they calmed and adapted to the boat experience, usually finding a bit of shade in the boat and going to sleep. Thank you, pets.

    Peat thinking about September 21
    Angus thrilled to be off the boat (and on the Madison for a change)
    3 Generations (me, my dad, who taught me how to cast in 1973, and my nephew who got us started on this boating thing last summer)
    Leslie taking her turn on the oars. Peat wants off (not because of Leslie’s rowing; he just wants off).
    One of Leslie’s many browns
    Finn breaking the news to me that my rowing sucks
    Dick (stepdad), me, brother Geoff, and our mom setting off for a bird-watching float
    In addition to many happy hours on the boat, we also had many Happy Hours on the boat
    Tying up some hoppers. We left the Missouri just before the fish began looking for them.
    Tying my go-to fly: the PMD cripple
    A brief interlude on the Madison added a lot
    Can’t tell you where
    Anchoring and wading made the days go by fast
    Geoff releasing a hard fighter
    “This 35-year-old fly your dad tied seduced the biggest fish I’ve caught here!”
    Peat’s love and Angus’s patience
    Finn’s football of a brown – tiny head and tail, huge, round body
    Porter (Finn’s brother) rows for Finn and their mom April
    Taking the Gates of the Mountains tour (highly recommended)
    Hanging out with family before the tour and during one of the remarkable rainstorms
    Morning thunder in the water
    Full moon float
    Until next year when we can just fish
  • Hunger

    Hunger

    I don’t know the people who will feed me…

    Frank O’Hara, “The Day Lady Died,” from Lunch Poems (1964)


    Please, sir, I want some more…

    Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist

    Warning: This post is way less about chukar and more about culture, if you can call it that.

    We’d probably prefer to think of the word “hunger” metaphorically rather than literally because it can represent a desire to achieve something great. Of course, as in Captain Ahab’s case, the merit of his quest was debatable, to say nothing of Jeffrey Dahmer’s. Still, absolute hunger is painful and real yet most of us don’t really know it.

    But I wonder about my dogs. They might.

    Peat, Angus, and before them Glenna, have all acted, all of the time, as though they were hungry. Because they never showed signs of being malnourished, I have always doubted them. Is it possible I’ve been wrong? To a dog, what is hunger? I’ll never really know.

    My first dog, Glenna, began life showing no interest in food. It worried me. She was about two when that worry did a 180; a friend came to visit with his two dogs, who were very interested in their food. Glenna caught on and, soon, was food-obsessed. In her twilight years, she would stand in the kitchen, her neck sloping toward the floor, eyes raised and locked on us, and scream at us to feed her, even if she’d recently eaten. I often wondered if the megaesophagus that resulted in her early demise was some sort of cosmic payback. It’s awful to think that, but I did.

    Glenna, about to yell at us.

    Angus, I believe, learned his attitude toward food from Glenna, and then Peat from Angus, although Peat’s really ratcheted it up a few notches. Peat also picked up the coprophagy from Angus, who, maybe relatedly, is still the only dog I’ve had who drinks his urine.

    Glenna teaching Angus how to eat wood
    Angus applying the principle to kibble

    Before you yield to the temptation to offer me advice, I’ve tried for years to “solve” this shit-eating thing. The most comical attempt, looking back on it, was buying some very expensive powder from Drs. Foster and Smith that you sprinkled on the dog’s food to make its poop taste bad. If my reason hadn’t been clouded by my own hunger to stop Angus from this disgusting habit, I would have realized how funny the powder idea was. I mean, it’s shit. How can you make it taste worse than it already does? Needless to say, it didn’t work. Ha ha. Joke’s on me. And I didn’t learn from that, apparently: recently I purchased some (again, very expensive) probiotic powder to put on the dogs’ food, thinking it might help them more completely metabolize their meals and, thus, make the potential residual nutrition in their stools less appetizing. It didn’t work, and Peat might have developed a nasty rash from the stuff. If anybody wants it, the jar’s on top of our garage fridge.

    Both dogs seem — except when hunting — glued to the idea that the world has food for them everywhere and their job is to find and eat it. Our walks are dominated by the poising of my thumb on the “tone” button (if it’s Peat I’m concerned about) or “momentary stimulation” button (if it’s totally deaf Angus I’m worried about) of the e-collar transmitter, hoping to distract the dogs from eating something I think they shouldn’t and which they think absolutely they should. It’s a perma-conflict. It makes me think of what someone once called golf: a good walk spoiled. It’s hopeless, too, because I nearly always have the wrong dog selected when one of them verges on an infraction. Peat stands on his back feet and scarfs chokecherries from overhead branches: I shock Angus. Angus stops mid-trail to inhale day-old turkey diarrhea: I buzz Peat.

    Sometimes, we forget the collars when we’re home, which we always say we’ll never do again, and then we forget them again. As we did last night during happy hour, when it was 98 degrees outside and we thought we’d enjoy a beer in the shade. The dogs had had a long walk-run in the morning, gone in and out all day long, and seemed generally quite tired, and we had just fed them. Plus, when we sit around the table outside, they like to join us by jumping in the padded chairs and halfsnooze in our presence. But not this time. Clearly, they remembered something from the night before, and it wasn’t until we noticed they weren’t chillin’ with us (a matter of a minute or two) that we realized they’d headed straight for the quail nest they’d pointed 24 hours earlier. Leslie got there in time to watch Peat eat several of the eggs but somehow managed to shoo him and Angus off and recovered and replaced 9 of the eggs (we had counted 16 the day before). Leslie was more upset by this than I was (but then I wasn’t there, having chosen to remain in the shade with my new homebrew); I tried consoling her by reasoning that we can’t pick and choose which version of the dogs’ prey drive we approve of: we love and brag about Peat’s prey drive, which makes him a phenomenal hunter but which also, sadly, means we have to live with it when we’re not hunting. That very morning, Peat began the day with his usual pre-feeding charade of trying to out-cyclone a cyclone, alternating growling and attacking Angus with rapid-fire circle spinning from the bedroom through the dog door, all peppered with deafening coyote-like shrieks, and then gobbling his 1/2 cup of kibble in 4 seconds. Sometime after I’d gone back to bed (about 5:30), he counter-surfed a container of mini-cupcakes, took them outside, and ate all of them and part of the container.

    Dogs pointing a quail nest
    Pre-attack eggs…

    So I guess I’m not sure where hunger ends and prey drive begins. How closely, if at all, are they related? If Angus hadn’t showed Peat his intense and nearly constant desire to eat or get fed, would Peat have limited his expression of hunger to the field? I’m under no illusion that we can change any of this (although I suspect some of you might disagree; as always, I’m open to suggestions). But, outside the annoyance of Peat’s daily insanity around feeding, I realized just the other day that I have spent the last 19 years worrying about whether my dogs are really feeling hunger. Because even just the feeling of hunger (and not actual hunger, where you’re starving literally) is painful, gnawing like heartbreak. I hope that’s not it. I don’t want my dogs to feel that.